Proof of Engine Age

289, FIA & Daytona topics
Post Reply
User avatar
Nick Lowe
T289R Member
T289R Member
Posts: 47
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 9:58 pm
Location: Winchester, Hampshire
Contact:

Proof of Engine Age

Post by Nick Lowe »

At my recent IVA all seemed OK but we got held up on proof of engine age. I have a C5AE casting of an original 289, the examiner wanted to do a cat test! I have an email from Ford over in the states which was submitted but did not find it's way to the test centre! Does any one have experience of how to prove the age of the engine. It appears that the casting number being referenced to books etc is not enough!
User avatar
Roger King
Posts: 4396
Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2007 10:29 pm
Location: St Ives, Cambs

Re: Proof of Engine Age

Post by Roger King »

Seems unreasonable - on any car I have submitted for test (or registration) I have shown the tester the casting numbers (actually a photo of the block, as the number's hard to get to!) and cross-referenced it with a copy of Tom Monro's 'How to build small-block Ford' book.
All testers I have encountered have been happy enough with this - not sure what else you can do!
You have shown him the number on the block, and you have shown him the reference document - what else CAN you do? The number can't be changed easily, the donor car presumably carries that date too - is there an appeals pathway?
Karl
Posts: 766
Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2007 8:43 pm
Location: Germany

Re: Proof of Engine Age

Post by Karl »

I had the stamped engine number, not the casting, and a letter from Ford Detroit. The last eight characters from the VIN of the car where the engine was originally fitted are stamped on the engine block and from this number they could tell exactly the year of built. But this was in SVA times, maybe things have changed.
Karl
User avatar
StewbieC
T289R Committee
T289R Committee
Posts: 1360
Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2008 12:50 pm
Location: out in the sticks, Shropshire

Re: Proof of Engine Age

Post by StewbieC »

I just printed the mail out that I got from Ford in the US. The tester was fine with that.
I did take Tom Monroes book with me too but he said the mail was proof enough and he didn't need to see the book.
I found the tester at Birmingham to be very fair and knew his stuff. He did most of the IVA's at the Birmingham test centre and knew it was a Ford engine when I opened the bonnet.
As long as there is plausible evidence they should be fine.
________________________________________________
Stu
Hawk 289, 66 Mustang Fastback with a 289 maximum smiles per mile..
User avatar
Roger King
Posts: 4396
Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2007 10:29 pm
Location: St Ives, Cambs

Re: Proof of Engine Age

Post by Roger King »

Karl wrote:I had the stamped engine number, not the casting, and a letter from Ford Detroit. The last eight characters from the VIN of the car where the engine was originally fitted are stamped on the engine block and from this number they could tell exactly the year of built. But this was in SVA times, maybe things have changed.
Karl
Not on a 289, they're not - the only individual engine number is an aluminium tag stuck under one of the intake bolts*. Was yours a 302, Karl?


*which is very easily fabricated, maybe they'd accept that? Again, see Monro's book for this info.
User avatar
clive
T289R Member
T289R Member
Posts: 3402
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 1:18 am
Location: Perth

Re: Proof of Engine Age

Post by clive »

I think the issue of engine age has changed recently due to a batch of "reproduction" Chevy blocks imported from Mexico. This unfortunately is a prime example of how bending the rules by a minority can have an adverse effect on the majority. :(
Cheers, Clive.

(If I'm not here I'm in my workshop or on the golf course!)
Karl
Posts: 766
Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2007 8:43 pm
Location: Germany

Re: Proof of Engine Age

Post by Karl »

Right Roger, it is a 302 block!
User avatar
Roger King
Posts: 4396
Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2007 10:29 pm
Location: St Ives, Cambs

Re: Proof of Engine Age

Post by Roger King »

clive wrote:I think the issue of engine age has changed recently due to a batch of "reproduction" Chevy blocks imported from Mexico. This unfortunately is a prime example of how bending the rules by a minority can have an adverse effect on the majority. :(
It's not just kit cars, it's having an effect on all classics as well. My Mini will be subject to scrutiny as the original Cooper 998 is being replaced by an age-correct 1275 'S'.

I suspect the issue is primarily around taxation, and the dodging thereof.
CobStang
Posts: 320
Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2011 3:21 pm

Re: Proof of Engine Age

Post by CobStang »

Nick Lowe wrote:At my recent IVA all seemed OK but we got held up on proof of engine age. I have a C5AE casting of an original 289, the examiner wanted to do a cat test! I have an email from Ford over in the states which was submitted but did not find it's way to the test centre! Does any one have experience of how to prove the age of the engine. It appears that the casting number being referenced to books etc is not enough!
The C5AE -6015-E number on your block is an engineering number not a cast date.
It is the smaller numbers next to it which will tell you the actual date the block was cast.
Eg 5 C 27 Decodes to
5= 1965
C= March
27 = 27th
Cast on 27th March 1965.
The C5AE engineering number ran thru to 1967.
The date the engine was assembled is on a pad in front of the LH side cyl head,
These date codes are on most other castings, on the heads they are next to the rocker posts.
Early B.R.A. Warmed 3.9 Rover, 5 sp, 3.07 rear, Fully adjustable front suspension with AVO coilovers, 4 link rear suspension AVO coilovers and Panhard bar, Big 2 pot front calipers, rear discs, servo'd, adjustable front / rear bias, scruffy paint job !
User avatar
Nick Lowe
T289R Member
T289R Member
Posts: 47
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 9:58 pm
Location: Winchester, Hampshire
Contact:

Re: Proof of Engine Age

Post by Nick Lowe »

Thx, I now have a letter from Ford and fingers crossed this will do ythe trick. Failing that I think we are into expert witness stuff!
Post Reply