Hawk front suspension parts

Technical Area for all the problems you have in the garage
Post Reply
User avatar
peterc
T289R Member
T289R Member
Posts: 2056
Joined: Wed Mar 05, 2014 9:05 am
Location: Surrey

Hawk front suspension parts

Post by peterc »

Hi guys
I'm just about to undertake a thorough recheck of all my suspension on the basis that it must have changed since build. Whilst I can't detect any slack but the front suspension bushes look a little tired at the edges so may well benefit from replacement. Do Gerry's tubular wishbones have bushes unique to his design or are they standard MGB. There is probably a difference between upper and lower due to the upper arms normally being the lever arm shocker on the original car.

Secondly any recommendations on ride heights? The race cars alway seem to have massive amount of ground clearance compared to mine.
I have 6.75" underside of the main chassis tube to ground at the rear but only 6.25" at the front ( approx in line with bulkhead) before the chassis bends up for the front suspension. Unfortunately the front spring mounting looks like it has no more adjustment so maybe new springs will be needed.
Any advice appreciated.
Peter C
User avatar
StewbieC
T289R Committee
T289R Committee
Posts: 1360
Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2008 12:50 pm
Location: out in the sticks, Shropshire

Re: Hawk front suspension parts

Post by StewbieC »

Morning Peter,
Gerrys suspension takes standard MGB Spring plate arm bushes but you need two sets to do top and bottom as the top wishbones take the same bushes.
Ride height is down to preference, mine is slightly higher than other Hawks, but roads where I live require it. It's still a low rider in comparison to that stupid ally bodied monster discussed in other threads.
Hope that helps.
________________________________________________
Stu
Hawk 289, 66 Mustang Fastback with a 289 maximum smiles per mile..
User avatar
peterc
T289R Member
T289R Member
Posts: 2056
Joined: Wed Mar 05, 2014 9:05 am
Location: Surrey

Re: Hawk front suspension parts

Post by peterc »

Hi Stu
Many thanks for the useful info of bushes being MGB and that they are duplicated.

Out of interest what is the dimension(s) of your chassis to ground.
Since re routing my exhaust the rear 2/3 rds usually clears most road bumps but the first 90degree bend attached to the down pipes takes a hit from sleeping policemen. Hence the desire to raise the front by 0.5" or so.
A quick check shows the car has definitely dropped 0.5" all round since the build which is not really surprising. It had a good workout in Wales last year!
Peter C
User avatar
amulheirn
T289R Committee
T289R Committee
Posts: 1207
Joined: Mon May 13, 2013 2:30 pm
Location: Surrey/Hampshire
Contact:

Re: Hawk front suspension parts

Post by amulheirn »

I think the Hawk kit specifies that they should be MGB V8 bushes, so perhaps roadster ones wouldn't be sufficient. I bought poly bushes from scparts.co.uk for mine.

Cheers,

Andrew
User avatar
StewbieC
T289R Committee
T289R Committee
Posts: 1360
Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2008 12:50 pm
Location: out in the sticks, Shropshire

Re: Hawk front suspension parts

Post by StewbieC »

Hi Peter,
Never measured before just adjusted mine to get even spacing on the wheel arches. I measured and I have 6.25" clearance to the main tubes front and back. I measured at the front on the flat before they rise up.
Hope that helps.
________________________________________________
Stu
Hawk 289, 66 Mustang Fastback with a 289 maximum smiles per mile..
User avatar
peterc
T289R Member
T289R Member
Posts: 2056
Joined: Wed Mar 05, 2014 9:05 am
Location: Surrey

Re: Hawk front suspension parts

Post by peterc »

Stu
Sounds like we worked to same plan. 2-3 fingers clear above each tyre to the outside of the arch.
Maybe I'll re think about raising it.

Andrew do you not find the polybushes transfer too much vibration.
Peter C
catsx11
Posts: 657
Joined: Sun Feb 02, 2014 10:00 pm

Post by catsx11 »

.
Last edited by catsx11 on Wed Aug 23, 2017 7:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
clive
T289R Member
T289R Member
Posts: 3402
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 1:18 am
Location: Perth

Re: Hawk front suspension parts

Post by clive »

I misread your last sentence as "the car's owner's weight." :P
Cheers, Clive.

(If I'm not here I'm in my workshop or on the golf course!)
User avatar
amulheirn
T289R Committee
T289R Committee
Posts: 1207
Joined: Mon May 13, 2013 2:30 pm
Location: Surrey/Hampshire
Contact:

Re: Hawk front suspension parts

Post by amulheirn »

peterc wrote: .... Andrew do you not find the polybushes transfer too much vibration.
Peter C
Hi Peter,

Actually (as you can see below) the front suspension on my car is currently a bit of a hard ride. A wooden pallet and four castor wheels (unadjustable for toe, camber and castor unfortunately) are the current solution.

Andrew
pallet - 1.jpg
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Paul Blore
Posts: 2077
Joined: Sat Nov 15, 2008 8:20 pm
Location: Leicestershire, UK
Contact:

Re: Hawk front suspension parts

Post by Paul Blore »

The chassis should have a slight nose down attitude as per Alan's setup above.

So many people are missing out on the best from their cars because they're not properly setup. The difference between a DIY setup and a professional specialist (not your local tyre depot), can be enormous.

Paul
Post Reply