PaulB wrote:
Hi James,
Using you cap and tape analogy and taking the offside wheel as an example. The wheel is the tape roll and the spinner is the cap. Moving the tape (wheel) in a clockwise motion (not rotating) as it would if the car was moving forward with anything other than perfect concentricity of the hub, the cap (spinner) will rotate anti-clockwise, thereby tightening it i.e. FFForward-OFFF.
QED
Paul
Roger, we are having a discussion here, if you don't want to join in, that's fine. Its very nitty gritty I'll agree, but no-one is getting harmed. By the way, what does your link tell us? Its a nice advert for a wedding car kit from an expensive wheel building company, but, I don't see any explanations there, or must I click on something?
On your other point, I don't like nuts - our car is a Cobra replica, so we made the wheels attach like Cobra did, ie spinners. There were lots of detail we did vary relative to Cobra for cost and other reasons. You've showed us some great examples of terrific Cobra detail Roger, I wonder why you draw the line here on this aspect. Maybe Cobra got the direction wrong and their wheels fall off?
Paul,
In Colin Chapmans explanation from which I am quoting, he doesn't state near or off-side. I realize your reply does, as an example, but I think that's misleading. He does say to rotate the tape or roll clockwise, but he doesn't say that the actual wheel is rotating clockwise. The contact area between the spinner and wheel actually rotates in the opposite direction to the wheel rotation. This is the key bit. Because one design contacts at the top, and the other the bottom, there is a difference in the spinner tightening direction, relative to the wheel direction. Colin doesn't say near or off-side, but he does, I think you will agree, say that the spinner tightening direction is either the same as the wheel rotating direction, or, it is the opposite direction, depending on whether its Rudge or Lotus.