289 Alloy

For Sale and Wanted Section
User avatar
Migge
T289R Member
T289R Member
Posts: 1598
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 5:51 pm

289 Alloy

Post by Migge » Mon Nov 13, 2017 5:53 pm

Special customized BRA289

peterc
T289R Member
T289R Member
Posts: 853
Joined: Wed Mar 05, 2014 9:05 am
Location: Surrey

Re: 289 Alloy

Post by peterc » Mon Nov 13, 2017 8:20 pm

I am amazed that they can openly admit that the chassis and body work has been changed yet they say the car is retaining the Aceca identity. An Aceca didn’t have a 289 engine and I’m sure significant number of other parts have never been near an Aceca.
It’s a bit expensive for a clone albeit an Ali one.
Peter C

User avatar
Migge
T289R Member
T289R Member
Posts: 1598
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 5:51 pm

Re: 289 Alloy

Post by Migge » Tue Nov 14, 2017 10:19 am

As far as I understand:

Sam started with an AC Aceca chassis – the identity it retains today, giving it period AC road registration– and built a correct Cobra chassis.
Special customized BRA289

Britishracingreen
Forum member
Forum member
Posts: 7
Joined: Sun Oct 15, 2017 4:51 pm

Re: 289 Alloy

Post by Britishracingreen » Tue Nov 14, 2017 11:35 am

Pretty sure that’s illegal?
A car can have a body change as long as it retains the original chassis, a change in body AND chassis is surely a whole new car (according to the DVLA)
Trying to “retain” the registration number from a different car is fraudulent ( well, it is in my understanding of the law in relation to motor vehicles in the UK anyway) or am I missing something?

Maxakarudy
Forum member
Forum member
Posts: 104
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2015 9:29 am

Re: 289 Alloy

Post by Maxakarudy » Tue Nov 21, 2017 8:46 am

COB 6036, is well documented as a total rebuild, new body & chassis & has a replica that used the damaged chassis

Britishracingreen
Forum member
Forum member
Posts: 7
Joined: Sun Oct 15, 2017 4:51 pm

Re: 289 Alloy

Post by Britishracingreen » Tue Nov 21, 2017 9:52 am

Lots of cars have had new chassis, and as far as I’m aware, the DVLA are happy to sanction it as long as it is a replacement for the original. I’m sure there are hoops the owner has to jump through to guarantee it’s “replication”
Swapping a body is one thing, swapping to a completely different chassis is something else entirely!
Sadly this sort of thing is doing nothing for these cars and you can bet that at some time in the future will be used by the authorities as an excuse for “tightening up” the regulations once more. I for one wouldn’t be putting details about it out on the internet for all to see if you get my drift!

Maxakarudy
Forum member
Forum member
Posts: 104
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2015 9:29 am

Re: 289 Alloy

Post by Maxakarudy » Tue Nov 21, 2017 4:30 pm

My understanding is the ladder frame & suspension of the Aceca was the same as a 289, I could be wrong tho

Britishracingreen
Forum member
Forum member
Posts: 7
Joined: Sun Oct 15, 2017 4:51 pm

Re: 289 Alloy

Post by Britishracingreen » Tue Nov 21, 2017 8:14 pm

Hmmmmm, seems to be a bit of a grey area. He seems to state in the advert that he started with an acceca chassis and built a Correct Cobra chassis. The DVLA seems to frown on major chassis mods (ie SWB beach buggies) and insists in IVA tests. Has the new chassis been OK’d by the DVLA? Could be a nasty shock for the new owner down the line. Don’t think I’d risk it!

User avatar
nikbj68
T289R Committee
T289R Committee
Posts: 1199
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 3:31 pm
Location: Anglesey, North Wales.
Contact:

Re: 289 Alloy

Post by nikbj68 » Wed Nov 22, 2017 12:19 am

What the ad is clumsily trying to say is that Sam Smart had to remove the parts of the Aceca chassis that are not required on a Cobra(like the roof!), not that he made a new chassis!
Hawk 289 FiA...AT LAST!!!

Britishracingreen
Forum member
Forum member
Posts: 7
Joined: Sun Oct 15, 2017 4:51 pm

Re: 289 Alloy

Post by Britishracingreen » Wed Nov 22, 2017 7:04 am

If that’s the case, the advert should DEFINITELY be Made clearer before it attracts unwanted attention!

Post Reply